Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
Petitioner: Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent: Warden T. Scarantino
Case Number: 5:2024hc02033
Filed: February 6, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Terrence W Boyle
Referring Judge: Robert B Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION for Emergency Hearing and Request for an Immediate Release Order filed by Malik Al-Shabazz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.)
March 25, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION (Petition) For Full Access To The Law Library And Automatic Law Library filed by Malik Al-Shabazz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.)
March 25, 2024 Motion Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle regarding #11 MOTION for Emergency Hearing and Request for an Immediate Release Order. (Lopez, R.)
March 25, 2024 Motion Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle regarding #10 MOTION (Petition) For Full Access To The Law Library And Automatic Law Library. (Lopez, R.)
February 29, 2024 Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Hardy, Shari)
February 29, 2024 Filing 8 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED (Hardy, Shari)
February 29, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Malik Al-Shabazz. (Hardy, Shari)
February 29, 2024 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Warden Scarantino filed by Malik Al-Shabazz. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope) (Hardy, Shari)
February 29, 2024 Case Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for petition review. (Hardy, Shari)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER of Deficiency. The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Response due by 2/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 2/8/2024. Copy of order and form sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
February 6, 2024 Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Malik Al-Shabazz #34814-171 at Butner - F.M.C. (Hardy, Shari)
February 6, 2024 Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western. Case Number 7:24-cv-00094. transfer order and docket sheet obtained from transferring district.
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order transferring case to USDC Eastern District of North Carolina. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 2/6/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 2/6/2024.]
February 5, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Malik Al-Shabazz. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 2/6/2024.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Malik Al-Shabazz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden T. Scarantino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?