United States of America v. Calhoun
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Julius Calhoun
Case Number: 5:2024hc02040
Filed: February 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Terrence W Boyle
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2024 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph H. Craven on behalf of Julius Calhoun. (Craven, Joseph)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay. The hearing and deadlines are held inabeyance until further notice from the Court. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/20/2024. (Hardy, Shari)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Seal #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/20/2024. (Hardy, Shari)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - Respondent, having demonstrated eligibility for appointment of counsel at government expense, the Federal Public Defender is DIRECTED to provide representation in this action. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/20/2024. (Hardy, Shari)
February 16, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Respondent's Competency to Stand Trial in the Middle District of Alabama filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna)
February 16, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna)
February 16, 2024 Filing 3 SEALED (Selected Participants Only)Forensic Report received as to Julius Calhoun (available to: Respondent Julius Calhoun, Petitioner United States of America). (Petre, Genna) Modified on 2/20/2024 to removed "proposed" from docket text (Hardy, Shari).
February 16, 2024 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Genna D Petre on behalf of United States of America. (Petre, Genna)
February 16, 2024 Filing 1 Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4246(a) against Julius Calhoun, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna)
February 16, 2024 Motions Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle regarding #5 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Respondent's Competency to Stand Trial in the Middle District of Alabama, #4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report . (Hardy, Shari)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Calhoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By: Genna D Petre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Julius Calhoun
Represented By: Joseph H. Craven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?