Brown v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Victor Brown and Martha Brown |
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation |
7:2008cv00130 |
August 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
xxU.S. Outside District |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 223 ORDER granting in remaining part and denying in remaining part 51 Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. Suzanne Parisian - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/20/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 211 ORDER granting in part 101 Motion to Seal Document; granting 132 Motion to Seal; and, granting 182 Motion to Seal - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/7/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 209 ORDER granting 199 Motion Regarding Trial Transcripts - If arrangements can be made and an agreement reached betwee the parties and the court reporter(s) on the costs of such services before trial, the court reporter(s) may provide daily official copies of the trial transcripts and daily realtime rough drafts of the trial transcripts to the parties who wish to purchase them. No costs associated with defendant's request are to be borne by the court. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 9/6/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 196 ORDER granting 195 Motion for a Telephone Conference - The court is unable to accommodate conference during the week of August 13. Assuming the parties' availability at one of the times listed below, the parties shall designate a representat ive to confirm as soon as possible and in any event by not later than the close of business tomorrow a time of mutual availability for conference to commence next week: 1) anytime between 9:00 am and noon Monday, August 6; 2) 4:00 or 4:30 pm Tuesday, August 7; or 3) 3:30 pm, 4:00 pm or 4:30 pm Wednesday August 9. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/02/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 192 ORDER granting 46 Motion to Apply New Jersey Law to Issue of Punitive Damages; granting in part and denying in part 103 Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence Concerning Dissimilar Adverse Drug Experience (ADE) Reports; denyi ng 114 Motion in Limine Exclude Evidence Based on Incorrect Legal Standards; granting in part 116 Omnibus Motion in Limine; granting in part 121 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of NPC's Subsequent Knowledge/Conduct; granting in part and holding in abeyance in part 132 Motion to Seal Document; denying as moot 146 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal; and, granting in part 156 Motion to Seal Document - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/26/2012. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 98 ORDER granting 50 Motion to Seal Document and 56 Motion to Seal Document; granting in part and denying in part 64 Motion for Leave to File and 73 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 76 Motion to Strike; and, granting 85 Motion to Seal Document - Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel on 11/29/2011. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 91 ORDER granting 90 Motion for Status Conference - A telephonic status conference shall hereby be held in this matter on Monday, November 21,2011 at 1:00 p.m. EST. (Dial in information contained in attached order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Daniel on 11/08/2011. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 43 ORDER granting 41 Motion to Designate Action as First Case for Trial During the February 21, 2012 New Bern Term - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 05/18/2011. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.