Kelly et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| Morgan Kelly, Pamela Kelly and Terry Kelly |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 7:2010cv00172 |
| September 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Southern Division Office |
| BEAUFORT |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice on or before April 14, 2016. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/29/2016. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER granting 126 Joint Motion for Court-Hosted Settlement Conference - This case is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge James E. Gates for purposes of scheduling a Court-Hosted settlement conference pursuant to Local Rule 101.2. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/14/2016. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER granting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/25/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER granting 93 Motion to Dismiss - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/18/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and adopting 80 Memorandum and Recommendation - In accordance with the court's case management order issued February 25, 2011, and subsequently amended, the parties shall file a supplemental report within ten (10) days from date of entry of this order as to any need for additional discovery and suggested case deadlines. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/23/2013. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 60 Motion to Seal Document - It is hereby ORDERED that the document, DE # 58-2, previously filed in this action shall be and remain SEALED. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/29/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Compel and 47 Motion to Compel - Plaintiffs' motions for oral argument are denied. Where plaintiffs' motions are granted, defendant shall serve the discovery to be produced with in fourteen (14) days of entry of this order, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall submit joint report proposing scheduling matters no later than twenty-one (21) days from date of entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/14/2012. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 24 Motion for Hearing and granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Strike - Plaintiffs' motion to strike affirmative defenses is ALLOWED as to the fourth affirmative defense. As to the seventh affirmative defense, plai ntiffs' motion to strike is ALLOWED as to the minor's waiver of her own claims. Attempted defense on this basis is not supported under law. Affirmative defense persists however, at to the mother's waiver of the minor's claims. Plaintiffs' motion to strike is DENIED in this remaining part. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/10/2011. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
