Breslow Construction, LLC v. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. et al
| United States of America for the use of Breslow Construction, LLC |
| Caddell Construction Co., Inc., W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company, Caddell Yates Joint Venture, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company |
| 7:2010cv00249 |
| December 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Southern Division Office |
| ONSLOW |
| James C. Fox |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER denying as moot the 47 Motion to Intervene. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 11/30/2011. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 24 and 27 Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration. The parties are ORDERED to resolve all issues pertaining to this civil action through arbitration in Montgomery, Alabama, as stipulated to by all parties involved. This action hereby is STAYED pending resolution of such arbitration. Furthermore, the parties are DIRECTED to submit a status report of the arbitration proceedings no later than 90 days from the filing date of this order, and every 90 days thereafter, until such proceedings are concluded. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 5/25/2011. (Foell, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
