Sampson v. HSBC Finance Corporation et al
Shirley Rose Sampson |
HSBC Finance Corporation, HSBC Consumer Lending, USA, Inc., Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Beneficial Financial I, Inc., Shapiro and Ingle, LLP and Richard P. McNeely |
Khufu-Sutukh: Ranub-El |
7:2012cv00050 |
March 1, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
SAMPSON |
James C. Fox |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Proposed Amended Complaint is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. To the extent it seeks relief from this court, the Objections document is DENIED. Any other pending motion is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 4/4/2012. (Edwards, S.) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying without prejudice 6 Motion for Writ of Discovery. Accordingly, all persons hereby are NOTIFIED that the court intends to dismiss this action for failure to prosecute by the real party in interest, unless, on or before 3/30/12, a comp etent real party in interest shows cause, in writing, why naming a deceased person as the plaintiff/real party in interest was the result of an understandable mistake. The response should be accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that conforms with requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules of this court.Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 3/21/2012. (Foell, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.