Strickland, et al v. Jackson, et al
||Mike Strickland, Jo Allison Strickland and Sarah Strickland
||Tina Jackson and City of Clinton, North Carolina
||July 20, 2012
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Southern Division Office
||Louise Wood Flanagan
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 5, 2014
ORDER - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before Monday, April, 21, 2014. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 03/05/2014. (Baker, C.)
|December 12, 2012
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Substitute Party - Sarah Strickland is hereby substituted as a party Plaintiff, in place of Jo Allison Strickland as Next Friend for Sarah Strickland. Sarah Strickland shall henceforth prosecute her claims directly and individually, and Jo Allison Strickland shall remain an individual Plaintiff in prosecution of her own claims, and the caption of this action shall henceforth reflect this substitution. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/12/2012. (Baker, C.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?