Velazquez, et al v. Burch Equipment, L.L.C., et al
Agustina Velazquez, Omar Segundo-Urbina, Moises Segundo-Urbina and Luis Fernando-Velazquez |
Burch Equipment, L.L.C., Burch Farms, L.L.C., James Paul Burch, William E Burch, Francis T Burch and Teresa Burch |
7:2014cv00303 |
December 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
DUPLIN |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER granting 49 Joint MOTION TO APPROVE NOTICE TO CLASS ACTION MEMBERS AND TO APPROVE METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTING NOTICE - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/8/2016. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 42 Order - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated wit hin forty-five (45) days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice on or before February 8, 2016. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/23/2015. (Tripp, S.) |
Filing 29 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 08/03/2015. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.