Phipps v. Grady et al
Plaintiff: Virginius R. Phipps
Defendant: Benjamin L. Grady, Stratton F. Stokes, C. L. Johnson, Blake Wallace, The Duplin County North Carolina Sheriff's Office, Duplin County, North Carolina and Dale Faircloth
Case Number: 7:2015cv00103
Filed: May 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Southern Division Office
County: DUPLIN
Presiding Judge: James C. Fox
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 JUDGMENT in favor of Duplin County, North Carolina, The Duplin County North Carolina Sheriff's Office, Benjamin L. Grady, Blake Wallace, C. L. Johnson, Dale Faircloth, Stratton F. Stokes against Virginius R. Phipps. Signed by Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 10/25/2016. Copy sent to Virginius R. Phipps, 812 Warren Road, Faison, NC 28341 via US Mail. (Edwards, S.)
August 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Duplin County Sheriffs Office, Duplin County, andJohnson are DISMISSED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause within fourteen (14) days of the fili ng date of this order why Defendants Stokes and Wallace were not timely served in this matter. Failure to show cause within the time allotted will result in dismissal of Defendants Stokes and Wallace withoutprejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 8/31/2016. Copy sent to Virginius R. Phipps, 812 Warren Road, Faison, NC 28341 via US Mail. (Edwards, S.)
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting 31 Motion to Stay Discovery pending the court's ruling on the Defendants' motion to dismiss. Within 14 days following the court's ruling on the motion to dismiss the parties shall conduct the Rule 26(f) conference and file a proposed discovery plan within 7 days thereof. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 2/23/2016. Copy sent to Virginius R. Phipps, 812 Warren Road, Faison, NC 28341 via US Mail on 2/23/2016. (Grady, B.)
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER declining to adopt the 3 Memorandum and Recommendations. All claimsagainst Defendant Faircloth are DISMISSED. As to all other defendants, this action may proceed with regard to Plaintiff's § 1983 claim arising from the April 30, 20 11 incident, while any claims arising from the December 14, 2009 incident are DISMISSED. As to Phipps's malicious prosecution claim against Defendant Grady, this action may proceed under the court's supplemental jurisdiction, to the extent that it arises from the April 30, 2011 incident. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue the summonses prepared by Plaintiff. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summonses and a copy of the complaint on Defendants. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 12/8/2015. (copy sent to Virginius R. Phipps, 812 Warren Road, Faison, NC 28341 via US Mail) (Edwards, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phipps v. Grady et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Virginius R. Phipps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin L. Grady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stratton F. Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. L. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blake Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Duplin County North Carolina Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duplin County, North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dale Faircloth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?