Cannon et al v. Village of Bald Head Island, North Carolina et al
Plaintiff: Thomas M Cannon, Jesse M Conner, Donald M Koons and Nicholas M Terrell
Defendant: Village of Bald Head Island, North Carolina, Calvin R. Peck, Jr. and Caroline Mitchell
Case Number: 7:2015cv00187
Filed: August 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Southern Division Office
County: NEWHANOVER
Presiding Judge: Malcolm J. Howard
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER granting in part 158 Motion for Bill of Costs. For the foregoing reasons, the motion for bill of costs [DE-158] is GRANTED in part. As the prevailing parties, plaintiffs Thomas M. Cannon, Jesse M. Conner, Donald M. Koons, and Nicholas M. Terrell are awarded (1) $427.60 in costs pursuant to § 1920(1); (2) $7,013.10 in costs pursuant to § 1920(2) and (3) $1,585.15 in costs pursuant to § 1920(3). Total costs in the amount of $9,025.85 are taxed against defendants Calvin R. Peck, Jr., and Caroline Mitchell and shall be included in the judgment. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/10/2021. (Waddell, K.)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 173 ORDER regarding 156 Motion for Attorney Fees, 161 Motion for Disallowance of Costs, and 164 Motion for Prejudgment Interest. For the reasons set forth herein, the court lacks jurisdiction to address Plaintiffs' motion for prejudgment interest [DE 164] and, therefore, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. In addition, the Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and non-taxable costs [DE 156] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court also notes that Defendants� 39; "motion for disallowance of costs" is, in essence, a response in opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys ' fees and costs, and Plaintiffs' "response" to Defendants' motion is actually a reply in supp ort of their motion; thus, the court directs the Clerk of the Court to rectify the record by re-naming the documents on the docket sheet in accordance with this order. Signed by Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 7/26/2021. (Waddell, K.)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 155 JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiffs Donald M. Koons, Jesse M. Conner, Nicholas M. Terrell and Thomas M. Cannon against defendants Calvin R. Peck, Jr. and Caroline Mitchell. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/30/2020. (Lee, L.)
June 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' Motion 52 for Oral Argument in Opposition to 38 and 44 , and plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond and Extend Length, 66 , are DENIED. Defendant Mitchell's Motion for S ummary Judgment, 38 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants Peck and Village's Motion for Summary Judgment, 44 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. see order for remaining CLAIMS. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 6/22/2017. (Foell, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cannon et al v. Village of Bald Head Island, North Carolina et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas M Cannon
Represented By: Bradley A. Coxe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse M Conner
Represented By: Bradley A. Coxe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald M Koons
Represented By: Bradley A. Coxe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas M Terrell
Represented By: Bradley A. Coxe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Village of Bald Head Island, North Carolina
Represented By: Norwood P. Blanchard, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calvin R. Peck, Jr.
Represented By: Norwood P. Blanchard, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caroline Mitchell
Represented By: Norwood P. Blanchard, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?