BlackRock Engineers, Inc. v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC et al
Plaintiff: BlackRock Engineers, Inc.
Defendant: Duke Energy Progress, LLC, AMEC Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc. and Charah, Inc.
Case Number: 7:2015cv00250
Filed: November 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Southern Division Office
County: NEWHANOVER
Presiding Judge: James C. Dever
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 504
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 247 JUDGMENT - Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/9/2019. (Sellers, N.)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER denying 73 Motion for Discovery. The court extends the discovery perioduntil October 12, 2018, to permit Duke Energy to depose witnesses concerning BlackRock's damages. Dispositive motions are due no later than November 13, 2018. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 9/18/2018. (Sellers, N.)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER denying 77 Motion to Compel. The court finding that the award of expenses would be unjust, each party shall bear its own expenses incurred on the motion. Signed by US Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 9/17/2018. (Sellers, N.)
May 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER denying 80 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 82 Motion to Amend Answer. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 5/31/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
November 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 67 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 11/9/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER denying 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 31 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 9/23/2016. (Briggeman, N.)
September 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (As Modified) - Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 9/9/2016. (Briggeman, N.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BlackRock Engineers, Inc. v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BlackRock Engineers, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Richard Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMEC Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charah, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?