Cybernet, LLC et al v. David et al
Cybernet, LLC and Aladdin Real Estate, LLC |
Jonathan David, James McVicker and Travis Deaver |
7:2016cv00016 |
February 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
BLADEN |
Terrence W. Boyle |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 ORDER - Defendant David's motion for summary judgment [DE-87] and Defendants McVicker's and Deaver's motion for summary judgment [DE-91] are allowed as to the § 1983 claim, the declaratory judgment claim, and takings claim under the United States Constitution, and the state law claims are remanded to Bladen County Superior Court. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 11/2/2018. (Grady, B.) |
Filing 86 ORDER granting 70 Motion to Compel and denying 74 Motion to Compel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 2/9/2018. (Grady, B.) |
Filing 31 ORDER allowing in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and denying as moot 30 Motion to Dispense with Mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 9/19/2016. (Grady, B.) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Stay pending the court's ruling on Defendant David's motion to dismiss. Within 14 days following the court's ruling on the motion to dismiss the parties shall file an amended proposed discovery plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 4/6/2016. (Grady, B.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.