Lamb v. Wallace, et al
| Larry Lamb |
| Blake Wallace, Dalton Jones, Bruce Kennedy, Unknown Surety for Sheriff of Duplin County, Unknown Officers of Duplin County Sheriff's Office and Unknown Agents of State Bureau of Investigations |
| 7:2016cv00044 |
| March 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Southern Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
265
Order - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlemen t not be consummated within 45 days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice on or before January 29, 2021. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/16/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
249
ORDER granting 248 Consent Motion to Substitute Party. Connie M. Jones, Executrix of the Estate of Dalton R. Jones, Deceased added. Dalton Jones (in his Individual and Official Capacities) terminated. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/3/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER granting 214 Motion to Seal Document 213 PROPOSED SEALED Document. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/1/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
209
ORDER granting 203 Motion to Dismiss defendant James Adcox. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/27/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
192
ORDER granting 181 Motion to Seal 175 PROPOSED SEALED Document, 179 PROPOSED SEALED Exhibit, 176 PROPOSED SEALED Document, 174 PROPOSED SEALED Response, 177 PROPOSED SEALED Document, 178 PROPOSED SEALED Document. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/21/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
111
ADJUSTED FINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER granting 108 Motion FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE COURTS CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Discovery due by 6/15/2018. All potentially dispositive motions due by 8/15/2018. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for additional critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/23/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER denying 72 Motion to Quash (Subpoenas to FBI and U.S. Attorney) - The court hereby DIRECTS the parties to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, in an effort to reach an agreement concerning the ter ms of a protective order, if appropriate. The parties shall jointly submit, within twenty-one (21) days of this order, a motion and proposed protective order or notice informing the court of the parties' respective positions with regard to a protective order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 2/12/2018. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 68 Motion For Adjustments To The Court's Case Management Order. Discovery in this case may be governed by a protective order. Discovery due by 3/15/2018. Mediation deadline reset for 3/15/2018. Motions due by 4/15/2018. After the court has ruled on any dispositive motion(s), the court will enter a scheduling order governing deadlines and procedures for final pretrial conference and trial, as appropriate. Counsel should review the attached order in its entirety for additional critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/7/2017. (Edwards, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
