Walker v. Colvin
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||April 19, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Southern Division Office
||James C. Dever
|Nature of Suit:
||Supplemental Security Income
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 402
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 5, 2018
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is Ordered to pay $14,490.75 to Plaintiff's Counsel, Jonathan P. Miller, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) for work performed in Federal Court. Plaintiff's Counsel is Ordered to return the $5,500.00 EAJA fee to Plaintiff. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/5/2018. (Sellers, N.)
|August 1, 2017
JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED, to the extent that Plaintiffs attorney shall be paid the sum of $5,500.00 for attorney fees under the EAJA, and provided that Plaintiff owes no outstanding federal debt. No additional petitionpursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) shall be filed. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/1/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|June 28, 2017
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court adopts the conclusions in the M&R [D.E. 25]. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 19] is GRANTED, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [D.E. 22] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/28/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?