New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Bennett Brothers Yachts, Inc.
New Hampshire Insurance Company |
Bennett Brothers Yachts, Inc. |
7:2016cv00237 |
June 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
NEWHANOVER |
James C. Dever |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER denying 53 Motion in Limine; denying 56 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 12/28/2018. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 52 ORDER denying 46 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/14/2018. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 42 ORDER - The court GRANTS NIDC's motion to amend the judgment [D.E. 38] and VACATES the judgment. The court DENIES the motion for bill of costs [D.E. 37]. The parties shall engage in a court-hosted settlement conference with United States Magistrate Judge Gates. Judge Gates will contact the parties about the settlement conference. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 5/22/2018. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 36 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court GRANTS defendant's motion for summary judgment [D.E. 20]. The court DENIES as moot plaintiffs objection to defendant's Exhibit N [D.E. 32]. Defendant may file a motion for costs in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court's local rules. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 12/28/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.