Rhodie v. Colvin
| Audrey Rhodie |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| 7:2016cv00358 |
| October 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Southern Division Office |
| BLADEN |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in the matter of Audrey Rhodie and Nancy A. Berryhill. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/12/2018. (Foell, S.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting defendant's 27 Motion for Leave to Appear by VTC on 11/1/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 10/13/2017. (Foell, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rhodie v. Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Audrey Rhodie | |
| Represented By: | H. Clifton Hester |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
