Rhodie v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Audrey Rhodie
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 7:2016cv00358
Filed: October 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Southern Division Office
County: BLADEN
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in the matter of Audrey Rhodie and Nancy A. Berryhill. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/12/2018. (Foell, S.)
October 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting defendant's 27 Motion for Leave to Appear by VTC on 11/1/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 10/13/2017. (Foell, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhodie v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Audrey Rhodie
Represented By: H. Clifton Hester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?