Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Wernock et al
||Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
||Geraldine Wernock, James Eves, III and Dawna Marie Hight
||February 14, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
||Southern Division Office
||James C. Dever
|Nature of Suit:
||Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
|Cause of Action:
||29 U.S.C. § 1132
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 16, 2017
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss and Discharge by Plaintiff and Stakeholder in Interpleader. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that MetLife is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, from this Lawsuit, pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 1335 and R ule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all parties to this action are permanently enjoined from filing suit against MetLife or otherwise seeking recovery against MetLife related to, arising from, or in any way connected to life insurance policy# 0118839, (the "Policy"), the proceeds payable under the Policy, this action, or the facts set forth in connection therewith. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/16/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
|May 25, 2017
ORDER granting 16 Motion to File Manually; granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Geraldine Wernock answer due 6/5/2017. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical information and deadlines. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/25/2017. Sent to Thomas M. Harvey at Law Office of Thomas Harvey PO Box 707 Rich Square, NC 27869 via United States Mail. (Briggeman, N.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?