Tracy v. Berryhill
Deborah Tracy |
Nancy Berryhill |
7:2017cv00081 |
April 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
PENDER |
James C Dever |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court hereby awards Plaintiff $3,500.00 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. 2412(c) and (d)), paid to Plaintiffs attorney if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. 3716). If there is such a debt, any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiffs attorney. In addition, the Court hereby awards Plaintiff $400.00 for court costs. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 12/13/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #18 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 12/13/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE regarding #18 Consent MOTION for Attorney Fees under EAJA (no objection) filed by Nancy Berryhill. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Goldenberg, Mark) |
Motion Submitted to Chief Judge James C. Dever III: regarding #18 Consent MOTION for Attorney Fees under EAJA. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 18 Consent MOTION for Attorney Fees under EAJA filed by Deborah Tracy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Time Log, #2 Exhibit Fee Contract, #3 Text of Proposed Order) (Hall, Charlotte) |
Filing 17 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/30/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 10/30/2017. (Briggeman, N.) |
Motion Submitted to Chief Judge James C. Dever III: regarding #15 Consent MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration under sentence 4 of 42 USC 405(g). (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 15 Consent MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration under sentence 4 of 42 USC 405(g) filed by Nancy Berryhill. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Goldenberg, Mark) |
TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #14 . Defendant shall have up to and including October 26, 2017 to file her motion for judgment on the pleadings and supporting memorandum of law. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/24/2017. (Hockaday, A.) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding: #14 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 14 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Nancy Berryhill. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Goldenberg, Mark) |
Filing 13 Memorandum in Support regarding #12 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Deborah Tracy. (Hall, Charlotte) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Deborah Tracy. (Hall, Charlotte) |
Filing 11 ORDER setting briefing schedule. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 6/23/2017. (Attachments: #1 Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Form) (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 10 Transcripts - Social Security Case (Goldenberg, Mark) |
Filing 9 Transcripts - Social Security Case (Goldenberg, Mark) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Nancy Berryhill. (Goldenberg, Mark) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Mark J. Goldenberg on behalf of Nancy Berryhill. (Goldenberg, Mark) |
Filing 6 Affidavit of Service for Affidavit of Service filed by Deborah Tracy served on Nancy Berryhill, John S Bruce, Jeff Sessions on 04/27/2017. (Hall, Charlotte) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to Nancy Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Counsel is reminded to print summonses and effect service. (Briggeman, N.) |
Filing 4 USM-285 Forms filed by Deborah Tracy . (Hall, Charlotte) Modified on 4/21/2017 to insert document identification. (Campbell, J.). |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Deborah Tracy (Hall, Charlotte) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Charlotte Williams Hall on behalf of Deborah Tracy. (Hall, Charlotte) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy Berryhill ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-4062734.), filed by Deborah Tracy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Hall, Charlotte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tracy v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deborah Tracy | |
Represented By: | Charlotte Williams Hall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill | |
Represented By: | Mark J. Goldenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.