Murphy v. New Hanover County Department of Social Services et al
Defendant: Dante Murphy, New Hanover County Department of Social Services and Michelle Winstead
Case Number: 7:2017cv00229
Filed: December 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Southern Division Office
County: NEWHANOVER
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 83 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered March 30, 2021, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/30/2021. (Collins, S.)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Seal 60 PROPOSED SEALED Document 59 PROPOSED SEALED Document, 58 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support. IT IS ORDERED that the exhibits lodged at DE 60-2 and DE 60-7 are SEALED. Within seven days, defendant is ORDERED to file a redacted version of DE 60-2 that complies with Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Except as expressly provided herein, IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that those documents lodged at DE 58, 59, and 60, including all attachments except DE 60-2 and 60-7, be UNSEALED. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/5/2020. (Collins, S.)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER denying 34 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. Having disposed of the instant motion, the court hereby LIFTS the stay on this case, and an initial order on planning and scheduling will follow. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/18/2019. (Collins, S.)
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. Because the deficiencies in plaintiff's complaint may be curable b y amendment, the court grants plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. In the event no amended complaint is filed by that time, the clerk is DIRECTED to enter final judgment closing this case based upon the decision herein. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/3/2019. (Collins, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. New Hanover County Department of Social Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dante Murphy
Represented By: Michael C Harman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Hanover County Department of Social Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Winstead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?