Health & Beauty Technologies, Inc et al v. Merz Pharma GmbH KgaA et al
| Health & Beauty Technologies, Inc and Medi-Build International, Corp. |
| Merz Pharma GmbH KgaA and Merz North America, Inc. |
| Ted E. Bandstra and Bruce Wayne Greer |
| 7:2018cv00117 |
| March 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Southern Division Office |
| xxU.S. Outside District |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
270
Order - The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlemen t not be consummated within 45 days hereof. The parties are directed to file their Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice on or before October 31, 2020. As there appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes, this case is removed from the active docket. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/16/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
267
ORDER granting 264 Joint MOTION To Modify the Amended Case Management Order. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 8/3/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
263
ORDER granting 261 Joint MOTION regarding 258 Scheduling Order, Joint Motion To Modify The Case Management Order. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/6/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
250
ORDER - Plaintiffs' motion to amend or alter the judgment 241 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court VACATES its judgment and DIRECTS the clerk to reopen this case. Plaintiffs' claim for unjust enrichment is ALLOWED to proceed to discovery. Plaintiffs' remaining causes of action are DISMISSED. Defendants' motion for bill of costs 237 is DENIED AS MOOT. The court's initial order on planning and scheduling will follow. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/8/2020. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
236
JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's order entered September 26, 2019, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, defendant Merz Pharma's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENI ED and defendant Merz NA's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, in which Merz Pharma joins, is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/26/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER granting 230 Motion to Seal Document 229 PROPOSED SEALED Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/10/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
214
ORDER granting 212 Motion to Seal 209 PROPOSED SEALED Response, exhibits 209-2 through 209-6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 7/22/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER granting 198 JOINT MOTION to Modify Schedule for Completion of Jurisdictional Discovery. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/25/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER - Defendants' objection 195 to the magistrate judge's December 5, 2018, order is OVERRULED and the magistrate judges order is AFFIRMED, subject to plaintiffs' agreement to confer in good faith regarding custodians and search terms as set forth herein. The deadline for compliance with the magistrate judge's order remains January 22, 2019. The parties are DIRECTED to file, upon close of jurisdictional discovery period, or by February 22, 2019, wh ichever is earlier, a notice setting forth the parties' proposed deadlines for completion of briefing on motions to dismiss filed at 191 and 193 , accompanied by proposed order if agreed. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/15/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 170 Motion to Compel. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 12/5/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER - This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion 179 to amend complaint. Upon careful review of the motion, defendants' response in opposition, and reply thereto, plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED. Pl aintiffs are DIRECTED to file their proposed second amended complaint within two days of the date of this order. In addition, where an amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect, Young v. City of Mount R anier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001), in anticipation of filing second amended complaint in light of this order, the court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE defendants' motion to dismiss first amended complaint 145 149 . Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/28/2018. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER granting 157 Motion for Reconsideration regarding Text Order - The court VACATES its July 17, 2018, text order denying as moot defendants' motions to dismiss the first amended complaint. The first amended complai nt, (DE 141), and defendants' motion to dismiss same, (DE 145, 149), are REINSTATED. Plaintiffs' second amended complaint, (DE 153), is rendered without legal effect. The clerk is DIRECTED to raise notation on the docket that DE 145 and DE 149 are pending motions. Plaintiffs' responses to defendants' motions to dismiss the first amended complaint are due within 14 days hereof. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/12/2018. (Tripp, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
