Mosley v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Carrie Etta Mosley
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 7:2018cv00197
Filed: December 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2018 Filing 9 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Office of the Program Law, Office of the General Counsel on 12/6/2018. (Sellers, N.)
December 20, 2018 Filing 8 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Attorney General Jefferson Sessions on 12/10/2018. (Sellers, N.)
December 6, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Nancy A. Berryhill served on 12/6/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Sellers, N.)
December 3, 2018 Filing 6 Summonses Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Sellers, N.)
December 3, 2018 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Carrie Etta Mosley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email from Ricci Disability Group, #2 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Carrie Mosley) (Sellers, N.)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 12/3/2018. (Sellers, N.)
December 3, 2018 Remark: Certified copy of #4 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Sellers, N.)
November 7, 2018 Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Sellers, N.)
November 6, 2018 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Carrie Etta Mosley (Gillespie, James)
November 6, 2018 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by James B. Gillespie, Jr on behalf of Carrie Etta Mosley. (Gillespie, James)
November 6, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Carrie Etta Mosley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit Attachment 1 to Complaint, email from Ricci Disability Group, #4 Exhibit Attachment 2 to Complaint, Affidavit of Carrie Mosley, #5 Process Receipt & Return for Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, #6 Proposed Summons for Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, #7 Process Receipt & Return for Office of the Program Law, Office of the General Counsel, #8 Proposed Summons for Office of the Program Law, Office of the General Counsel, #9 Proposed Summons for U.S. Attorney John S. Bruce, #10 Process Receipt & Return for U.S. Attorney John S. Bruce) (Gillespie, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mosley v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrie Etta Mosley
Represented By: James B. Gillespie, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?