Revak v. Miller et al
| Marisa Revak |
| Hans J. Miller, Onslow County Sheriff's Office and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company |
| 7:2018cv00206 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2003 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING - Discovery Plan due by 2/22/19. Counsel should read attached order in its entirety for critical information and deadlines. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/18/2019. (Collins, S.)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Hans J. Miller, Onslow County Sheriff's Office, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (Robinson, H.)
|
|
Filing 10
Notice of Appearance filed by H. Stephen Robinson on behalf of Hans J. Miller, Onslow County Sheriff's Office, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (Robinson, H.)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint, filed by Hans J. Miller, Onslow County Sheriff's Office, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Adams, Mary)
|
|
Filing 8
Financial Disclosure Statement by The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Adams, Mary)
|
|
Filing 7
Financial Disclosure Statement by Onslow County Sheriff's Office (Adams, Mary)
|
|
Filing 6
Financial Disclosure Statement by Hans J. Miller (Adams, Mary)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Appearance filed by Mary Craven Adams on behalf of Hans J. Miller, Onslow County Sheriff's Office, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (Adams, Mary)
|
|
TEXT ORDER granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint #9 . For good cause shown and with the consent of Plaintiff, it is ordered that Defendants shall have up to and including January 16, 2019, within which to respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 12/17/2018. (Hockaday, A.)
|
|
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Tripp, S.)
|
|
Filing 4
Financial Disclosure Statement by Marisa Revak (Kornbluth, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Appearance filed by Michael A. Kornbluth on behalf of Marisa Revak. (Kornbluth, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Hans J. Miller, Onslow County Sheriff's Office, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.)
|
|
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Marisa Revak. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Notice to Counsel - All Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-4732833.), filed by Marisa Revak. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Bond, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Sheriff Hans Miller, #4 Proposed Summons Onslow County Sheriff's Office, #5 Proposed Summons The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company) (Kornbluth, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
