Phelps v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Jeremy D. Phelps
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 7:2019cv00037
Filed: March 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2019 Filing 9 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN served on Attorney General on 3/19/19. (Collins, S.)
March 25, 2019 Filing 8 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN served on Nancy Berryhill, Commissioner of Social Security on 3/14/19. (Collins, S.)
March 21, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed on U.S. Attorney as to Nancy A. Berryhill served on 3/18/2019, answer due 5/17/2019. (Collins, S.)
March 6, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Collins, S.)
March 6, 2019 Remark - Certified copy of Order #4 and file-stamped copies of summonses, complaint, notice of appearance and financial disclosure statements forwarded to U.S. Marshal, along with USM-285 forms. (Collins, S.)
March 5, 2019 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill filed by Jeremy D. Phelps. (Collins, S.)
March 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by Plaintiff. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summonses and a copy of the complaint on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 3/5/2019. (Collins, S.)
March 5, 2019 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.)
February 26, 2019 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jeremy D. Phelps (Miller, Jonathan)
February 26, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Jonathan P. Miller on behalf of Jeremy D. Phelps. (Miller, Jonathan)
February 26, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Jeremy D. Phelps. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon, Jr.; Attorney General William P. Barr; Office of The Program Law, Office of the General Counsel, #4 Supplement USM-285 - U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon, Jr.; Attorney General William P. Barr; Office of The Program Law, Office of the General Counsel) (Miller, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phelps v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy D. Phelps
Represented By: Jonathan P. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?