Nance v. American United Life Insurance Company (AUL) et al
| Cheryl Nance |
| American United Life Insurance Company (AUL) and Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc. |
| 7:2019cv00053 |
| March 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-4866536.), filed by Cheryl Nance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons for AUL, #3 Proposed Summons Summons for Disability RMS, #4 Notice of Appearance for Brian Kinsley, #5 Financial Disclosure Form for Brian Kinsley, #6 Financial Disclosure Form for Cheryl Nance, #7 Index Index of Exhibits, #8 Exhibit Exhibit A - Approval Letter April 29, 2016 and LTD Denial Letter July 1, 2016, #9 Exhibit Exhibit B - Nance Appeal Letter, #10 Exhibit Exhibit C - Appeal Denial Letter, #11 Exhibit Exhibit D - Second Appeal Letter, #12 Exhibit Exhibit E - Disability RMS Denial Letter, #13 Exhibit Exhibit F - Disability RMS Final Denial Letter, #14 Exhibit Exhibit G - Deardo APS, #15 Exhibit Exhibit H - Graham APS, #16 Exhibit Exhibit I - Graham Statement and APS, #17 Exhibit Exhibit J - Locklear APS, #18 Exhibit Exhibit K - Job Description and Occupation Evaluation, #19 Exhibit Exhibit L - AUL LTD Policy) (Kinsley, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
