Hinkle v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company et al
M.D. David John Hinkle |
Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company and Unum Group |
7:2019cv00069 |
April 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Unum Group identifying Corporate Parent Unum Group for Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company. (Haynes, Sonny) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Sonny S. Haynes on behalf of Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Unum Group. (Haynes, Sonny) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Elizabeth J. Bondurant on behalf of Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Unum Group. (Bondurant, Elizabeth) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Unum Group, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company from Superior Court of New Hanover County, case number 19-CVS-730. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-4895554), filed by Unum Group, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint and Summons (New Hanover Superior Court), #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal (New Hanover Superior Court), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet) (Haynes, Sonny) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.