Knipp v. 3M Company
| Labrae Knipp |
| 3M Company |
| 7:2019cv00163 |
| August 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case has been opened in the Northern District of Florida as case 3:19-cv-3507. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER - This case is transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of April 3, 2019, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (Stay lifted on 9/18/2019.) (Sellers, N.) |
| Case transferred to the Northern District of Florida. File transmitted electronically. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 3M Company. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 3
Order Redesignating Division - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable James C. Dever III, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future documents shall reflect the new case number of 7:19-CV-163-D. No further filing shall be made in 5:19-CV-376-D. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/30/2019. (Sellers, N.)
|
| TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. At the direction of the Court, this case is reassigned to United States District Judge James C. Dever III for all further proceedings. United States District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan is no longer assigned to the case. All future filings shall reflect the revised case number of 5:19-CV-376-D. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/30/2019. (Hockaday, A.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel: This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
| Case transferred in from Western Division on 08/30/2019. Old Case Number 5:19-cv-376. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Labrae knipp (Ramey, Martin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5081888.), filed by Labrae knipp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Ramey, Martin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Knipp v. 3M Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Labrae Knipp | |
| Represented By: | Martin A. Ramey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 3M Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
