Brock et al v. First Protective Insurance Co.
| Ms. Courtney Brock and Mr. Geoffrey Brock |
| First Protective Insurance Co. |
| 7:2020cv00093 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Courtney Brock, Geoffrey Brock (Earley, David) |
Filing 12
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/15/2020. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Filing 11 Memorandum in Support regarding #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by First Protective Insurance Co.. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by First Protective Insurance Co.. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Jeffrey D. Keister on behalf of First Protective Insurance Co.. (Keister, Jeffrey) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #11 Memorandum in Support. Pursuant to District Judge Richard E. Myers II Practice Preferences, counsel shall email proposed orders in a word processing format to Documents_Judge_Myers@nced.uscourts.gov. (Waddell, K.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #11 Memorandum in Support. Counsel is reminded that the case number on the pleadings should read as 7:20-CV-93-M. No need to refile at this time. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew J. Gray on behalf of Courtney Brock, Geoffrey Brock. (Gray, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 Financial Disclosure Statement by Courtney Brock, Geoffrey Brock (Earley, David) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by David W. Earley on behalf of Courtney Brock, Geoffrey Brock. (Earley, David) |
| Filing 5 Notice regarding #1 Notice of Removal and requirement to make a Notice of Appearance sent to Counsel for Plaintiff, Matthew J. Gray and David W. Earley of Young Moore and Henderson, P.A. at Post Office Box 31627, Raleigh, NC 27622 mailed via US Mail on June 8, 2020. (Rudd, D.) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Waddell, K.) |
| Notice to Counsel - All Counsel shall file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED DOCUMENT by First Protective Insurance Co.. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Removal Cover Sheet) (Pytlik, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by First Protective Insurance Co. identifying Corporate Parent PWC Financial, Inc. for First Protective Insurance Co.. (Pytlik, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Stephen Kyle Pytlik on behalf of First Protective Insurance Co.. (Pytlik, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by First Protective Insurance Co. from Pender County Civil Superior Court, case number 20-CV-409. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0417-5456284), filed by First Protective Insurance Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service) (Pytlik, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
