Gomez v. Saul
Plaintiff: Randolph Ladd Gomez
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 7:2020cv00197
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard E Myers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2020 Filing 9 Affidavit of Service for US Marshals 285 Form - Summons and Complaint served on Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security on 11/9/2020. (Waddell, K.)
November 12, 2020 Filing 8 Affidavit of Service for US Marshals 285 Form - Summons and Complaint served on US Attorney General on 11/2/2020. (Waddell, K.)
November 12, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney's Office served on 11/6/2020. (Waddell, K.)
October 16, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul., Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 US Marshal 285 Forms) (Waddell, K.)
October 16, 2020 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Randolph Ladd Gomez. (Waddell, K.)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by Plaintiff. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summonses and a copy of the complaint on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 10/15/2020. (Waddell, K.)
October 16, 2020 Remark - Copy of order and file-stamped copies of summonses, complaint, notice of appearance and financial disclosure statement forwarded to U.S. Marshal for service, along with USM-285 forms. (Waddell, K.)
October 15, 2020 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Waddell, K.)
October 14, 2020 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Randolph Ladd Gomez (Gillespie, Michael)
October 14, 2020 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Michael Gray Gillespie on behalf of Randolph Ladd Gomez. (Gillespie, Michael)
October 14, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Randolph Ladd Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Process Receipt & Return for Office of the General Counsel, Office of the Program Law, #4 Process Receipt & Return for Attorney General William Barr, #5 Process Receipt & Return for U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon, Jr., #6 Proposed Summons for Office of the General Counsel, #7 Proposed Summons for Attorney General William Barr, #8 Proposed Summons for U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon, Jr.) (Gillespie, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gomez v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randolph Ladd Gomez
Represented By: Michael Gray Gillespie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?