Rose Hill United Methodist Church v. Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. et al
Rose Hill United Methodist Church |
Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. and Church Mutual Holding Company, Inc. |
7:2020cv00254 |
December 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. § 635 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint,, filed by Church Mutual Holding Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Welch, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 Financial Disclosure Statement by Church Mutual Holding Company, Inc. (Welch, Jennifer) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Waddell, K.) |
TEXT ORDER granting the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendant Church Mutual Holding Company, Inc. #13 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that this defendant has up to and including March 22, 2021, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/9/2021. (Hockaday, A.) |
Filing 11 Financial Disclosure Statement by Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. (Welch, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by Steven Andrew Bader on behalf of All Defendants. (Bader, Steven) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint, filed by Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Welch, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Jennifer A. Welch on behalf of All Defendants. (Welch, Jennifer) |
TEXT ORDER granting the Motion for Extension of Time #9 filed by Defendant Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.. For good cause shown, it is ordered that this defendant has up to and including March 4, 2021, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/1/2021. (Hockaday, A.) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 7 Financial Disclosure Statement by Rose Hill United Methodist Church (Davenport, Michael) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Michael S. Davenport on behalf of Rose Hill United Methodist Church. (Davenport, Michael) |
Filing 5 Corrected Civil Cover Sheet. (Davenport, Michael) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Church Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Counsel did not identify exhibits pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. (i.e. "Exhibit A" is not a sufficient description). Additionally, when filing a document with more than five exhibits, the first attached exhibit must be an index of all the subsequent attached documents. No further actions is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #2 Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is reminded that the court prefers flattened pdf fillable forms. Counsel should "flatten" the Civil Cover Sheet prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Counsel should fill the form out completely and refile using the event "Notice-Other". (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Rose Hill United Methodist Church. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
REMINDER TO COUNSEL regarding #1 Complaint. Pursuant to Judge Myers Practice Preferences, counsel shall provide a courtesy copy of any motion, memorandum, or brief which exceeds 30 pages or of any exhibits which exceed a total of 30 pages, by mailing or delivering to the attention of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, 1003 South 17th Street, Wilmington, NC 28401. The courtesy copies of any motion, memorandum, or brief and supporting exhibits which exceed a combined total of 100 pages shall be submitted in a three-ring binder. (Waddell, K.) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Waddell, K.) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons, filed by Rose Hill United Methodist Church regarding #1 Complaint. (Davenport, Michael) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet, filed by Rose Hill United Methodist Church regarding #1 Complaint. (Davenport, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5801726), filed by Rose Hill United Methodist Church. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Certification of Policy, #2 Exhibit B- Information regarding loss, #3 Exhibit C- Information regarding fire and estimates, #4 Exhibit D- Information regarding repair/reconstruction and references, #5 Exhibit E-Statement of Loss, #6 Exhibit F- Appraisal of the Sanctuary Building) (Davenport, Michael) Modified on 1/4/2021 to describe exhibits. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.