Johnson v. YPS LLC
| Mark A Johnson |
| YPS LLC d/b/a Seaview Crab Company |
| 7:2021cv00004 |
| January 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER regarding #13 Notice of Settlement. This matter is DISMISSED as to the Defendant, subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days hereof. The parties are DIRECTED to file their Stipulation of Dismissal on or before March 22, 2021. Signed by Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 2/22/2021. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Mark A Johnson (Piervincenti, Arthur) |
| Document Submitted: #13 Notice of Settlement submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II. (Waddell, K.) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to File Answer Out of Time. Defendant YPS LLC shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by February 19, 2021. Signed by Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 2/8/2021. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Filing 11 Financial Disclosure Statement by YPS LLC (Racine, Russell) |
| Filing 10 Memorandum in Support regarding #9 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Answer Out of Time filed by YPS LLC. (Racine, Russell) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Answer Out of Time filed by YPS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Racine, Russell) |
| Motion Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #9 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Answer Out of Time. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Russell M. Racine on behalf of YPS LLC. (Racine, Russell) |
| Filing 7 Notice directing plaintiff to proceed after failure to answer in accordance with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of this notice. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 6 Affidavit of Service filed by Mark A Johnson . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- USPS Tracking Receipt) (Piervincenti, Arthur) Modified on 1/26/2021 to correct document description and identify exhibit(Waddell, K.). |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Arthur H. Piervincenti on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Piervincenti, Arthur) |
| TEXT ORDER: Notices of deficiency regarding counsel's failure to file a notice of appearance have gone unaddressed. Counsel is ORDERED to file the required notice of appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a) by January 29, 2021. Entered by Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 1/26/2021. (Waddell, K.) |
| Second Notice to Counsel regarding notice of appearance. Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to YPS LLC. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Notice COPYRIGHT REPORT: Copy of report and complaint forwarded to Register of Copyrights, U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000 via US Mail on January 7, 2021. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Mark A Johnson (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Piervincenti, Arthur) (Attachment 1 flattened and replaced on 1/13/2021) (Edwards, S.). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5812493.), filed by Mark A Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Piervincenti, Arthur) (Attachment 4 flattened and replaced on 1/13/2021) (Edwards, S.). |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: [1-4] Civil Cover Sheet, [2-1] Proposed Summons. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" the Civil Cover Sheet and the Proposed Summons prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Waddell, K.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. YPS LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: YPS LLC d/b/a Seaview Crab Company | |
| Represented By: | Russell M. Racine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark A Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Arthur H. Piervincenti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
