Graham v. Saul
Justin Carlisle Graham |
Andrew Saul |
7:2021cv00005 |
January 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Affidavit of Service for Summons & Complaint filed by Justin Carlisle Graham served on Office of the Program Law, Office of the General Counsel on 02/16/2021. (Gillespie, Michael) |
Filing 9 Affidavit of Service for Summons & Complaint filed by Justin Carlisle Graham served on Attorney General William Barr on 02/17/2021. (Gillespie, Michael) |
Filing 8 Affidavit of Service for Summons & Complaint filed by Justin Carlisle Graham served on U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon, on 02/17/2021. (Gillespie, Michael) |
Filing 7 USM-285 Form - Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Andrew Saul served on 2/16/2021, answer due 4/17/2021. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 6 Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Justin Carlisle Graham. (Filing fee $402 receipt number RAL083038.) (Sellers, N.) |
Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number RAL083038 (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may tender to the clerk the filing fee of $400.00 no later than February 19, 2021. If the plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee in the allotted time, the clerk shall close the matter without further order from the court. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 1/18/2021. (Sellers, N.) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Justin Carlisle Graham (Gillespie, Michael) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Michael Gray Gillespie on behalf of Justin Carlisle Graham. (Gillespie, Michael) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Justin Carlisle Graham. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon, Jr., #4 Proposed Summons for Office of the General Counsel, Office of the Program Law, #5 Proposed Summons for Attorney General William Barr, #6 U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon, Jr. Process Receipt & Return, #7 Office of the General Counsel Process Receipt & Return, #8 Attorney General William Barr Process Receipt & Return) (Gillespie, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Graham v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Justin Carlisle Graham | |
Represented By: | Michael Gray Gillespie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.