Williams v. Jacksonville Police Department et al
| Roland L. Williams |
| Stephanie Moser, Detective Timothy Carr, Officer Kevin Doyle and Jacksonville Police Department |
| 7:2021cv00007 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Pro Se E-Noticing - Pro se party Roland L. Williams has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents filed in CM-ECF will be served on this party via email pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 5.1. (Collins, S.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Roland L. Williams. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Roland L. Williams. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Roland L. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #5 Waiver of the Service of Summons, #6 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
