Duncan v. Saul
Plaintiff: Tiffany Duncan
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 7:2021cv00014
Filed: February 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security on 3/3/2021. (Sellers, N.)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Monty Wilkinson, Attorney General on 2/23/2021. (Sellers, N.)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 USM-285 Form - Summons Returned Executed by Personal Service as to Andrew Saul served on 2/16/2021, answer due 4/17/2021. (Sellers, N.)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Sellers, N.)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Tiffany Duncan. (Sellers, N.)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 2/4/2021. (Sellers, N.)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Remark: Certified copy of #4 Order and file-stamped copies of summonses and complaint forwarded to the United States Marshal for service, along with USM-285 Forms. (Sellers, N.)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #1 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Sellers, N.)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Scott A. Scurfield on behalf of Tiffany Duncan. (Scurfield, Scott)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Tiffany Duncan (Scurfield, Scott)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Tiffany Duncan. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Andrew Saul, #4 Proposed Summons Robert Higdon, #5 Proposed Summons Monty Wilkinson, #6 Andrew Saul, #7 Robert Higdon, #8 Monty Wilkinson) (Scurfield, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duncan v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Duncan
Represented By: Scott A. Scurfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?