Nelson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Catherine Nelson |
Boston Scientific Corporation |
7:2021cv00020 |
February 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER granting the Joint Motion for Extension of Time #11 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that Defendant has up to and including June 8, 2021, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/8/2021. (Hockaday, A.) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint filed by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Packer, Leslie) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by Leslie C. Packer on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation. (Packer, Leslie) |
Filing 9 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Catherine Nelson. Boston Scientific Corporation waiver sent on 2/8/2021, answer due 4/9/2021. (Fredona, Rebecca) |
Filing 8 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Rebecca L. Fredona on behalf of Catherine Nelson. (Fredona, Rebecca) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Christopher James Anglin on behalf of Catherine Nelson. (Anglin, Christopher) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Boston Scientific Corporation. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 5 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Christopher James Anglin on behalf of Catherine Nelson. (Anglin, Christopher) |
Notice to Counsel - All Counsel shall file their own Notice of Appearance or Notice of Special Appearance to ensure their name is added to the docket to receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEF's). (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Catherine Nelson (Anglin, Christopher) |
Filing 3 Notice filed by Catherine Nelson regarding #1 Complaint Summons. (Anglin, Christopher) |
Filing 2 Notice filed by Catherine Nelson regarding #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet. (Anglin, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boston Scientific Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-5867156.), filed by Catherine Nelson. (Anglin, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nelson v. Boston Scientific Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation | |
Represented By: | Leslie C. Packer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Catherine Nelson | |
Represented By: | Christopher James Anglin |
Represented By: | Rebecca L. Fredona |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.