Bryant v. Saul
| Tommy Ray Bryant |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 7:2021cv00116 |
| July 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN for Summons and Complaint as to Andrew M. Saul served on 7/28/2021, answer due 9/27/2021. (Tripp, S.) |
| Filing 12 Process Receipt and Return served on Commissioner of Social Security on 7/19/21. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 11 Process Receipt and Return served on US Attorney General on 7/23/21. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 10 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul filed by Tommy Ray Bryant. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Collins, S.) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Corrected Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue the summonses prepared by Plaintiff, and the United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summonses and a copy of the complaint on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr on 7/8/2021. (Collins, S.)
|
| Filing 7 Notice filed by Tommy Ray Bryant regarding #3 Complaint USM285 US Marshall Service. (Attachments: #1 Errata USM285_Civil Process, #2 Errata USM285_AttyGen) (Morton, James) |
| Filing 6 Notice filed by Tommy Ray Bryant regarding #3 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet. (Morton, James) |
| Remark - Certified copy of Order #8 and file-stamped copies of summonses, complaint, notice of appearance and financial disclosure statements forwarded to U.S. Marshal, along with USM-285 forms. (Collins, S.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #2 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 5 Financial Disclosure Statement by Tommy Ray Bryant (Morton, James) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by James Kevin Morton on behalf of Tommy Ray Bryant. (Morton, James) |
| Filing 3 Proposed COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Tommy Ray Bryant. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons) (Morton, James) Modified on 7/8/2021 to revise docket text. (Collins, S.). |
| Filing 2 Corrected MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Tommy Ray Bryant. (Morton, James) Modified on 6/25/2021 to clarify docket text. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 SEE CORRECTED COMPLAINT AT DE #2 - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Tommy Ray Bryant. (Morton, James) Modified on 6/25/2021 to reflect that a corrected IFP was filed at #2 . (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bryant v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tommy Ray Bryant | |
| Represented By: | James Kevin Morton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
