Oxendine v. The District Attorney's Office of Robeson County et al
| Gregory Oxendine |
| The District Attorney's Office of Robeson County, Robeson County Sheriff's Department, SBI of North Carolina, Matthew D. Scott and Burnis Wilkins |
| 7:2022cv00035 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff failed to comply with this court's order of March 29, 2022 [D.E. 3]. In light of plaintiffs' failure to comply, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/15/2022. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 4
ORDER - Plaintiff failed to comply with this court's order of March 29, 2022 [D.E. 3]. In light of plaintiffs' failure to comply, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 4/15/2022. (Sellers, N.)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III after no response to order by plaintiff. (Sellers, N.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - Not later than April 14, 2022, plaintiff shall file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees or pay the filing fee, to provide a financial disclosure statement, to provide a notice of self representation, and to provide proposed summonses. The court WARNS that if plaintiff fails to meet any other deadlines or act in accordance with the rules or orders of this court, sanctions (up to and including dismissal) will be imposed. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 3/29/2022. Sent to Gregory Oxendine at 853 Pearsall Rd. Red Springs, NC 28377 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III after no response by pro se plaintiff to #2 Order. (Sellers, N.) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER regarding deficiencies - Plaintiff is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected documents within fourteen (14) days from the filing of this order. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 3/9/2022. Sent to Gregory Oxendine at 853 Pearsall Rd.Red Springs, NC 28377 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for review and request for entry of a civil deficiency order. (Sellers, N.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. Counsel failed to file a JS44 Civil Cover Sheet as required by the Court. Counsel should file a Cover Sheet using the event "Notice-Other" as soon as possible. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Pro Se Party regarding: #1 Complaint. No Summons provided for issuance or Waiver of Service filed. (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Gregory Oxendine. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Pro Se Party. A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (No Filing fee paid), filed by Gregory Oxendine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
