Nicholas v. ILA Local 1426 et al
Reita L. Nicholas |
ILA Local 1426, Greg Washington, Fred Spain, SSA Cooper, LLC, Mike Smith and Boke Trading Inc. |
7:2023cv00228 |
March 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Kimberly A Swank |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank regarding #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Stouch, L.) |
Notice of Pro Se E-Noticing - Pro se party Reita L. Nicholas has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents filed in CM-ECF will be served on this party via email pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 5.1. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Reita L. Nicholas. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Reita L. Nicholas (This is not the court's form). (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Reita L. Nicholas. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Reita L. Nicholas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.