Palomar Specialty Insurance Company v. Parker et al
Palomar Specialty Insurance Company |
Walter Ray Parker, Jr. Individually and d/b/a B.P. Plumbing Co. and B.P. Plumbing, Inc. |
7:2023cv00513 |
March 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Robert T Numbers |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Notice Directing Plaintiff to Proceed After Failure to Answer. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 9 Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint filed by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company served on B.P. Plumbing, Inc. on April 18, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail green card) (Falls, Henry) |
Filing 8 Affidavit of Service for Summons and Complaint filed by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company served on Walter Ray Parker, Jr., Individually, and d/b/a B.P. Plumbing Co. on April 14, 2023. (Falls, Henry) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, #www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Case transferred in from Eastern Division on 03/28/2023. Old Case Number 4:23-cv-55. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to B.P. Plumbing, Inc., Walter Ray Parker, Jr. (Mann, Stephanie) (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) |
Filing 6 Order Redesignating Division - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable James C. Dever III, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 7:23-CV-513-D-RN. No further filing shall be made in 4:23-CV-55-D-RN. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/28/2023. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 5 Financial Disclosure Statement by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Palomar Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Palomar Holdings, Inc. for Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Falls, Henry) |
Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #4 Financial Disclosure Statement. Counsel failed to indicate the date of signature in the designated space just above the signature block. Counsel is directed to refile the document. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Palomar Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Palomar Holdings, Inc. for Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Falls, Henry) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by David C. Boggs on behalf of Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Boggs, David) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Henry Lee Falls, III on behalf of Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Falls, Henry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against B.P. Plumbing Co., B.P. Plumbing, Inc., Walter Ray Parker, Jr ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7009547.), filed by Palomar Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons of Defendant Walter Ray Parker, Jr., Individually, and d/b/a B.P. Plumbing Co., #3 Proposed Summons of Defendant B.P. Plumbing, Inc.) (Falls, Henry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.