Wierman v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Jeanne Wierman
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Case Number: 7:2023cv00523
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Referring Judge: Robert B Jones
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS an extension of time for the defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to plaintiff's complaint in all CLJA cases assigned to me through and including June 23, 2023. Entered by District Judge James C. Dever III on 5/1/2023. (Herrmann, L.)
April 27, 2023 Filing 8 OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on April 5, 2023, before Judge James C. Dever III. Court Reporter/Transcriber Amy M. Condon. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Please review Attorney obligations regarding the redaction of electronic transcripts of court proceedings available on the court's #website Redaction Request due 5/21/2023. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/31/2023. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/29/2023. (Condon, A.)
April 27, 2023 NOTICE of Filing of Official Transcript #8 Transcript. The parties have seven calendar days from the filing of the transcript to file a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction. The parties must also serve a copy on the court reporter or transcriber. After filing the Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, a party must submit to the court reporter or transcriber, within 21 calendar days of the filing of the transcript, a written statement indicating where the personal data identifiers to be redacted appear in the transcript. (Condon, A.)
April 5, 2023 Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge James C. Dever III in Raleigh: Status Conference held on 4/5/2023. Counsel present for all plaintiffs and the United States of America. Court addresses the massive number of potential cases and the ability of the four district judges of this court to resolve that number of cases. Court inquires of the United States regarding the number of claims filed and number resolved - Government responds. Court addresses how discovery should proceed in these cases. Counsel for the plaintiffs allowed time to speak - various issues discussed. Government notes need for relief regarding the hundreds of answers due in the next two months. Final comments made by the Court - written order anticipated to follow. (Court Reporter - Amy Condon) (Herrmann, L.)
March 31, 2023 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Timothy B. Walthall on behalf of United States of America. (Walthall, Timothy)
March 31, 2023 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Daniel Charles Eagles on behalf of United States of America. (Eagles, Daniel)
March 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Setting Hearing - Status Conference set for 4/5/2023 at 1:00 PM in Raleigh - 7th Floor - Courtroom 1 before District Judge James C. Dever III. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 3/29/2023. (Herrmann, L.)
March 28, 2023 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jeanne Wierman (Lee, Randolph)
March 28, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Randolph Lee on behalf of Jeanne Wierman. (Lee, Randolph)
March 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7012168.), filed by Jeanne Wierman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lee, Randolph)
March 28, 2023 NOTICE OF SERVICE. This action is governed by Standing Order 23-SO-1. Pursuant to that Order, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing System, notifying the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Division, Torts Branch, Environmental Torts Litigation Office, United States Department of Justice of the case. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. No summons will issue. Service of the Complaint and any attachments thereto will be completed by a regenerated Notice of Electronic Filing to follow immediately. (Herrmann, L.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wierman v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeanne Wierman
Represented By: Randolph Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Daniel Charles Eagles
Represented By: Timothy B. Walthall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?