McQueary v. United States of America
Christopher McQueary |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Torts Branch USDOJ |
7:2023cv00826 |
April 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Robert B Jones |
Richard E Myers |
P.I.: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by LaCresha A. Johnson on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Johnson, LaCresha) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by Geoffrey C. Cook on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Cook, Geoffrey) |
Filing 9 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Doug P. Desjardins on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Desjardins, Doug) |
TEXT ORDER - In keeping with the scope and tenor of the Master Docket Order (7:23-cv-897), the court GRANTS an extension of time for the Defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's complaint in all CLJA cases assigned to me through and including June 23, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II on 5/3/2023. (Reznick, Debra) |
Filing 8 DISREGARD - Corrected notice filed at #9 - Notice of Appearance filed by Doug P. Desjardins on behalf of Christopher McQueary. (Desjardins, Doug) Modified to indicate corrected filing on 5/4/2023 (Reznick, Debra). |
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission. Attorney Douglas P. Desjardins must file a notice of special appearance within ten days, unless one has already been filed. Local Counsel is DIRECTED to serve this order on out-of-state counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/1/2023. (Reznick, Debra) |
Filing 7 Receipt of payment filed by Christopher McQueary regarding #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit of Douglas P. Desjardins . (Anderson, Joseph) Modified text to reflect correct attachment on 5/1/2023 (Reznick, Debra). |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit of Douglas P. Desjardins filed by Christopher McQueary. (Attachments: #1 Fee Receipt) (Anderson, Joseph) |
Filing 5 DISREGARD, refiled correctly at #6 - MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit of Douglas P. Desjardins filed by Christopher McQueary. (Anderson, Joseph) Modified on 4/28/2023 - deleted automatic referral to magistrate judge and new filing (Reznick, Debra). |
NOTICE OF SERVICE. This action is governed by Standing Order 23-SO-1. Pursuant to that Order, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing System, notifying the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Division, Torts Branch, Environmental Torts Litigation Office, United States Department of Justice of the case. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. No summons will issue. Service of the Complaint and any attachments thereto will be completed by a regenerated Notice of Electronic Filing to follow immediately. (Reznick, Debra) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Amanda Christina Dure on behalf of Christopher McQueary. (Dure, Amanda) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph L. Anderson on behalf of Christopher McQueary. (Anderson, Joseph) |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Christopher McQueary (Anderson, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BNCEDC-7036137.), filed by Christopher McQueary. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Christopher McQueary Claim Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.