Thomas v. United States of America
| Roy Thomas |
| United States of America |
| Torts Branch USDOJ |
| 7:2023cv00850 |
| April 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Robert B Jones |
| Richard E Myers |
| P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Warren D. Postman on behalf of Roy Thomas. (Postman, Warren) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Zina Bash on behalf of Roy Thomas. (Bash, Zina) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission. Attorney Warren Postman must file a notice of special appearance within ten days, unless one has already been filed. Local Counsel is DIRECTED to serve this order on out-of-state counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/22/2023. (Reznick, Debra) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit (Warren Postman) filed by Roy Thomas. (Attachments: #1 PHV Fee Receipt) (Messner, Frederick) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit (Zina Bash) filed by Roy Thomas. (Attachments: #1 PHV Fee Receipt) (Messner, Frederick) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission. Attorney Zina Bash must file a notice of special appearance within ten days, unless one has already been filed. Local Counsel is DIRECTED to serve this order on out-of-state counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/17/2023. (Reznick, Debra) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Frederick Messner on behalf of Roy Thomas. (Messner, Frederick) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by LaCresha A. Johnson on behalf of United States of America. (Johnson, LaCresha) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Geoffrey C. Cook on behalf of United States of America. (Cook, Geoffrey) |
TEXT ORDER - In keeping with the scope and tenor of the Master Docket Order (7:23-cv-897), the court GRANTS an extension of time for the Defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's complaint in all CLJA cases assigned to me through and including June 23, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II on 5/3/2023. (Reznick, Debra)
|
| NOTICE OF SERVICE. This action is governed by Standing Order 23-SO-1. Pursuant to that Order, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing System, notifying the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Division, Torts Branch, Environmental Torts Litigation Office, United States Department of Justice of the case. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. No summons will issue. Service of the Complaint and any attachments thereto will be completed by a regenerated Notice of Electronic Filing to follow immediately. (Reznick, Debra) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Complaint - Out-of-district counsel should file a Notice of Special Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.1(e)(1). (Reznick, Debra) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by William Michael Dowling on behalf of Roy Thomas. (Dowling, William) |
| Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Roy Thomas (Dowling, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7044161.), filed by Roy Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dowling, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
