Lehman v. United States of America
Brenda Lehman |
United States of America |
Torts Branch USDOJ |
7:2023cv00863 |
April 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
P.I.: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time for the defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to plaintiff's complaint in all CLJA cases assigned to me through and including June 23, 2023. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/9/2023. (Carter, Alexus) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Bu, Nathan) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Carter, Alexus) |
Filing 9 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Warren D. Postman on behalf of Brenda Lehman. (Postman, Warren) |
Filing 8 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Zina Bash on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Bash, Zina) |
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission. Attorney Warren D. Postman must file a notice of special appearance within ten days, unless one has already been filed. Local Counsel is DIRECTED to serve this order on out-of-state counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/23/2023. (Carter, Alexus) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit (Warren Postman) filed by Brenda Lehman. (Attachments: #1 PHV Fee Receipt) (Messner, Frederick) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit (Zina Bash) filed by Brenda Lehman. (Attachments: #1 PHV Fee Receipt) (Messner, Frederick) |
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission. Attorney Zina Bash must file a notice of special appearance within ten days, unless one has already been filed. Local Counsel is DIRECTED to serve this order on out-of-state counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/19/2023. (Carter, Alexus) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Frederick Messner on behalf of Brenda Lehman. (Messner, Frederick) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Nathan Jisu Bu on behalf of United States of America. (Bu, Nathan) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by William Michael Dowling on behalf of Brenda Lehman. (Dowling, William) |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Brenda Lehman (Dowling, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7044961.), filed by Brenda Lehman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dowling, William) |
Notice to Counsel - Out-of-district counsel should file a Notice of Special Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.1(e)(1). (Carter, Alexus) |
NOTICE OF SERVICE. This action is governed by Standing Order 23-SO-1. Pursuant to that Order, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing System, notifying the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Division, Torts Branch, Environmental Torts Litigation Office, United States Department of Justice of the case. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. No summons will issue. Service of the Complaint and any attachments thereto will be completed by a regenerated Notice of Electronic Filing to follow immediately. (Carter, Alexus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.