Harris et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -
| Roger Harris, John Van Buskirk and William Heinzerling |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 7:2023cv00914 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| P.I.: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Redesignated as a miscellaneous case as directed and reassigned to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle in text order by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court. (Rudd, D.) |
| TEXT ORDER of Redesignation - At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Southern Division miscellaneous case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge, is the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 7:23-MC-8-BO. No further filing shall be made in 7:23-CV-914. Petitioners are directed to pay the miscellaneous filing fee on or before May 12, 2023. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/2/2023. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Robert Aaron Greenberg on behalf of Roger Harris, William Heinzerling, John Van Buskirk. (Greenberg, Robert) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Perpetuate Testimony of Roger Harris, John Van Buskirk and William Heinzerling., filed by Roger Harris, William Heinzerling, John Van Buskirk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Claim Forms, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Greenberg, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
