Ward v. Hooters of America, LLC et al
| Margaret Ward |
| Hooters of America, LLC and terill waddell |
| 7:2023cv01067 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Robert T Numbers |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Margaret Ward (Robinson, Sharika) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hooters of America, LLC. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - No Summons provided for issuance or Waiver of Service filed for defendant, Terill Waddell. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel is reminded that the Notice of Appearance is a stand alone document. In the future, counsel should attach the civil cover sheet and the proposed summons to the complaint. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Sharika M. Robinson on behalf of Margaret Ward. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Coversheet, #2 Exhibit Hooters' Summons) (Robinson, Sharika) |
| Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Margaret Ward (Robinson, Sharika) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Margaret Ward ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7134479.), filed by Margaret Ward. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Right to Sue) (Robinson, Sharika) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
