Conklin v. Corteva, Inc. et al
| Eric Conklin |
| Corteva, Inc., DuPont De Nemours Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY and THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC |
| 7:2023cv01114 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Robert T Numbers |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Corteva, Inc., DuPont De Nemours Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company, The Chemours Company FC, LLC. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Eric Conklin (Wisnoski, Nevin) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Nevin Wisnoski on behalf of Eric Conklin. (Wisnoski, Nevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7164257.), filed by Eric Conklin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Corteva, Inc. Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons DuPont De Nemours Inc. Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons Chemours Company Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons Chemours Company FC LLC Proposed Summons) (Wisnoski, Nevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
