Barton v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Margery June Savage Barton
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Case Number: 7:2023cv01477
Filed: November 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Referring Judge: Brian S Meyers
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2023 Filing 15 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by D. Bruce Poole on behalf of Margery June Savage Barton. (Poole, D.)
November 8, 2023 Filing 14 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Philip C. Federico on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Federico, Philip)
November 8, 2023 Filing 13 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Chase Brockstedt on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Brockstedt, Chase)
November 8, 2023 Filing 12 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Brent Ceryes on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Ceryes, Brent)
November 8, 2023 Filing 11 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Matthew Legg on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Legg, Matthew)
November 8, 2023 Filing 10 DISREGARD - Refiled at #14 . Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Matthew Legg on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Legg, Matthew) Modified on 11/9/2023. (Herrmann, L.)
November 3, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit filed by Margery June Savage Barton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt for Pro Hac Vice) (Smith, Guy)
November 3, 2023 Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Elizabeth Ann Barry on behalf of United States of America. (Barry, Elizabeth)
November 3, 2023 Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Daniel Charles Eagles on behalf of United States of America. (Eagles, Daniel)
November 3, 2023 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission. Attorney D. Bruce Poole must file a notice of special appearance within ten days, unless one has already been filed. Local Counsel is DIRECTED to serve this order on out-of-state counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/3/2023. (Herrmann, L.)
November 3, 2023 TEXT ORDER granting #3 , #4 , #5 , #6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission. Attorneys Philip C. Federico, Chase T. Brockstedt, Brent P. Ceryes, and Matthew P. Legg must file a notice of special appearance within ten days, unless one has already been filed. Local Counsel is DIRECTED to serve this order on out-of-state counsel. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/3/2023. (Herrmann, L.)
November 2, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit filed by Margery June Savage Barton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt for Pro Hac Vice) (Smith, Guy)
November 2, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit filed by Margery June Savage Barton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt for Pro Hac Vice) (Smith, Guy)
November 2, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit filed by Margery June Savage Barton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt for Pro Hac Vice) (Smith, Guy)
November 2, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Admission and Affidavit filed by Margery June Savage Barton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt for Pro Hac Vice) (Smith, Guy)
November 2, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Guy Dixon Smith on behalf of Margery June Savage Barton. (Smith, Guy)
November 2, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7339243.), filed by Margery June Savage Barton. (Smith, Guy)
November 2, 2023 NOTICE OF SERVICE. This action is governed by Standing Order 23-SO-1. Pursuant to that Order, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing System, notifying the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Division, Torts Branch, Environmental Torts Litigation Office, United States Department of Justice of the case. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. No summons will issue. Service of the Complaint and any attachments thereto will be completed by a regenerated Notice of Electronic Filing to follow immediately. (Herrmann, L.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barton v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margery June Savage Barton
Represented By: Guy Dixon Smith
Represented By: Brent Ceryes
Represented By: Chase Brockstedt
Represented By: Matthew Legg
Represented By: Philip C. Federico
Represented By: D. Bruce Poole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Daniel Charles Eagles
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?