Bright et al v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Benjamin Lee Bright and Clenda Kay Bright
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Case Number: 7:2023cv01561
Filed: November 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Nathan Jisu Bu on behalf of United States of America. (Bu, Nathan)
November 7, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by David Justin Mason on behalf of Benjamin Lee Bright, Clenda Kay Bright. (Mason, David)
November 7, 2023 NOTICE OF SERVICE. This action is governed by Standing Order 23-SO-1. Pursuant to that Order, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing System, notifying the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina and the Civil Division, Torts Branch, Environmental Torts Litigation Office, United States Department of Justice of the case. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. No summons will issue. Service of the Complaint and any attachments thereto will be completed by a regenerated Notice of Electronic Filing to follow immediately. (Carter, Alexus)
November 7, 2023 Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Short Form Complaint. The case heading of the document does not comply with Local Civil Rule 10.1. In future filings, counsel should include the case number, which should read 7:23-cv-1561-FL. No action by counsel required. (Carter, Alexus)
November 7, 2023 Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Short Form Complaint. All Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Carter, Alexus)
November 6, 2023 Filing 1 SHORT FORM COMPLAINT against United States of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7344736.), filed by Benjamin Lee Bright, Clenda Kay Bright. (Mason, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bright et al v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Lee Bright
Represented By: David Justin Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clenda Kay Bright
Represented By: David Justin Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Nathan Jisu Bu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?