BASF CORPORATION v. AHRENS
1:2005cv00560 |
June 20, 2005 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
Durham Office |
JAMES A. BEATY |
RUSSELL A. ELIASON |
Personal Property: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT ORDER signed by Judge JAMES A. BEATY JR. on 6/24/05, pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the FRCvP, that Defendant, and any person acting in concert or participation with Defendant, is RESTRAINED and ENJOINED from, in any manner or by any means, using, disclosing or otherwise misappropriating any BASF property, including any trade secret, proprietary or confidential information of BASF, and, in particular, including without limitation any and all computer folders and files that belong to BASF. Fur thermore, Defendant and all persons with notice of this Order are prohibited from destroying, removing, transferring, or altering the following documents and things as set out; FURTHER that this Order shall be secured by the bond provided BASF on June 22, 2005, in the amount of $10,000.00. (Welch, Kelly) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BASF CORPORATION v. AHRENS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.