DICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2006cv00018
Filed: January 9, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Durham Office
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: FRANK W. BULLOCK
Presiding Judge: P. TREVOR SHARP
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE. RECOMMENDING taht petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion (docket no. 50) be construed as an attempt by petitioner to file a second or successive Section 2255 action. Further that this action be dismissed due to pet itioner's failure to obtain certification from the Fourth Circuit as required by 28:2244 and 2255 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d). ORDERING that the clerk send petitioner a copy of this recommendation, instruction forms for filing Section 2 255 actions in this Court and Motions for Authorization in the court of appeals, and four copies of Section 2255 forms. Petitioner should keep the original and two copies of the completed Section 2255 forms which can be submitted in this court if petitioner obtains approval from the Fourth Circuit. Signed by Judge P. TREVOR SHARP on 1/9/06. (Dickerson, Nancy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?