COLLINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2006cv00036
Filed: January 13, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Durham Office
Presiding Judge: WALLACE W. DIXON
Presiding Judge: N. C. TILLEY
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER AND RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by LARRY LAMONT COLLINS. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that petitioner's submission be construed as a motion to vacate sentence and tha t this action be filed and then dismissed sua sponte for failure to obtain certification for this 2255 application by filing a Motion for Authorization in the court of appeals as required by 28 U.S.C. 2255 and 2244 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d) . It is therefore ORDERED that the clerk send petitioner a copy of this recommendation, instruction forms for filing Section 2255 motions in this Court and Motions for Authorization in the court of appeals, and four copies of Section 2255 motion forms. Objections to R&R due by 1/30/2006.Signed by Judge WALLACE W. DIXON on 01/13/2006. (McClain, Abby)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COLLINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?